Mixed messages on Labour housing policy
Labour: the party without policies
Councillors believe they will be able to state voting intentions in advance
Imagine a juror giving an interview before the first day of a trial, in which they pledge to give a guilty verdict. “I’ve listened to the anger in this community about this crime,” the juror might say. “Whatever the defendant says, he’s going down”.
It would, of course, somewhat undermine your faith in the trial-by-jury system, which relies on jurors going into court with an open mind.
Everyone loves a planner
As the Liberal Democrat party conference in Birmingham draws to a close, it appears that Lib Dem party bosses have managed to keep a lid on the row over the government’s planning reform. Business secretary Vince Cable is reported to have told a fringe meeting last night that “planning reform is not taking off, except for the Daily Telegraph, as a political issue”, and if you were to base your assessment of his statement solely on events at this conference, you’d be hard pressed to argue with him. Nevertheless, this is not to say that all Lib Dem party activists are happy with the direction of the government’s planning reforms. I got the sense from several of the packed fringe meetings on planning that I had attended that quite a few party members were concerned over the reforms, so I thought I’d sit in on a debate in the main hall to get a sense of what activists made of the reforms. Read more…
The five-point Liberal Democrat plan for dealing with the NPPF fallout
For the Liberal Democrats – a political party that prides itself on its localist credentials – the ongoing media furore over the draft National Planning Policy Framework will have left party strategists with a headache, particularly given that the conference so far has been dominated by attempts to reassure party activists that being in government with the Tories is worthwhile. Read more…
Planning under attack at Lib Dem conference
Party conference season has begun and I’m in Birmingham to cover the Liberal Democrat party conference. I’ve barely been here for 24 hours, but have already heard several speakers – including senior politicians, developers and think-tank chiefs – lash out the planning system. Danny Alexander, the chief secretary to the Treasury, set the tone by using part of his speech on Sunday to hit out at the planning system, which he said is a “major vested interest” standing in the way of economic growth. “Bureaucracy, rules and red tape that mean it takes years to get things done,” Alexander told the conference. “A planning system that can take more than a decade to allow even modest developments to go forward,” he added. Read more…
The worst permitted development loopholes
We received an interesting email earlier this week alerting us to the existence of a new presentation on the top ten permitted development loopholes. The presentation, written by development control planner Steve Speed of website Planning Jungle, highlights what he says are ten examples of problems and flaws with the current version of government permitted development legislation.
Today’s front pages yesterday…
Avid Planning Blog readers will remember this post from earlier this week (pictured left), in which we mischievously suggested some ways for the Daily Telegraph to spice up its “Hands off our land” campaign opposing the coalition’s planning reforms. Read more…
PR lessons: how ministers could win public support for planning reforms
Despite being led by a Prime Minister with a background in public relations, the coalition government seems to have done a surprisingly poor job of selling the National Planning Policy Framework to the British public. Starting with outrage from groups as diverse as the National Trust and the Theatres Trust, opposition to the NPPF has mounted to the extent that the Tory-faithful Daily Telegraph has launched the “Hands off our Land” campaign to urge ministers to rethink the proposals. Read more…